Micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) make it possible to reduce the size of complex engineering devices to a micrometer scale,for various applications: micro positioning, micro fixturing, micromanipulation etc. Micro-thermal actuators convert thermal energy into force and motion. Here, we study a low voltage micro-thermalactuator that develops relatively large thermally-induceddeflections.
Figure1 - Electron microscope image of thermal actuator [1]
The U-shaped actuator analysed in this study consists of two parallel arms: cold and hot arm. They are connected to the pads substrate at one side and to each other at the other side, like in Figure 2.
EMS simulation coupled to thermo-structural analysis is used to compute the mechanical displacement of the micro-device caused by temperature expansion effect.
Figure 2 - The basic design of the U-shaped thermal actuator.
Table 1: Model dimensions [2]
Part | Dimension (µm) |
Hot arm length | 495 |
Hot arm width | 2 |
Cold arm length | 470 |
Cold arm width | 30 |
Arms separation | 10 |
Connecting bar width | 10 |
Pad length | 40 |
Pad width | 30 |
In order tocompute and visualize the mechanical displacement of the studied thermal actuator device,the Magnetostatic module is used along withthe steady state thermal and structural analysis.
The simulation setup consists of the following steps:In our case study, the following properties of material are used (Table 2):
Table 2:Polysilicon material properties
Property | Electrical conductivity (S/m) |
thermal conductivity (W/m. K) |
Thermal expansion coefficient (/K) |
Elastic Modulus (GPa) |
Poisson’s ratio |
Polysilicon | 43.5 E+03 | 150 | 2.9 E-06 | 169 | 0.22 |
The micro actuator is defined as a solid coil, carrying a voltage of 5V, with the hot-armconnected pad serving as the entry port. Theinitial temperature applied to both anchored pads is0 °C. The thermal convection is defined on the ambient air body, by setting theinitial (ambient) temperature to 273.15 K, and the convection coefficient to 10 W/ . A “Fixed” constraint structural boundary condition is applied to both sides of the anchored pads, as shown in the figure 3:
Figure 3 - Applied mechanical boundary conditions.
Figure 4 - Meshed model.
The final simulation results for the thermal distribution are shown in figure 5. The voltage difference across the pads causes a temperature difference between the two arms, therefore achieves a maximum value of 864°C at the most critical zone of the thin arm.
Figure 5 - Temperature distribution across the actuator.
The mechanical displacement caused by the thermal expansion effect reaches 16.99 µm. The actuator is moving mostly in the area connecting the two arms.
Figure 6 - Resultant displacement plot.
The comparison between EMS andthe reference [2] resultsfor the actuator deflection can be found in Table 3.
Table 3:Comparative table between EMS and the reference [2] results.
EMS | Reference [2] | |
Deflection (µm) | 16.99 | 17 |
EMS tool enables the validation and prediction of the micro-machined thermal actuators performance. It successfully evaluated and validated its capacityto produce large deflection under low supply voltages.