HOME / Applications / How Can Electrostatic Comb-Drive Actuators Be Optimized?

Enhancing Comb-Drive Actuator Performance

Used Tools: ems solidworks

A Comb-Drive Actuator

Electrostatic comb-drive actuators, known for easy design and application in fields like optical and wireless communication, biomedical engineering, and nanotechnology, aim to improve travel distance and force output. These devices consist of interdigitated fingers—one set fixed and the other movable, driven by electrostatic force under applied voltage. The EMS electro-structural module calculates this movement, focusing solely on the electrostatic forces, with gravity effects disregarded.

CAD Model

Figure 1 displays the geometry of the analyzed model, which has a thickness of 2 micrometers along the z-axis. All dimensions are provided in micrometers.


The-geometry-of- the analyzed actuator

Figure 1 - The geometry of the analyzed actuator


 

Materials properties

Table 1 given below summarizes the material properties required for the simulation.

 
Material Name Relative permittivity Electrical conductivity (Mho/m)  Elastic modulus  (N/m2) Poisson’s Ratio
PolySilicon 4.5 Not required 160e+09 0.22
Air 1 0 Not required Not required

Table 1 - Properties of materials assigned to the model


Boundary conditions

Electrical boundary condition 

Fixed voltage 1(0V)

In Figure 2, the finger colored blue is grounded, with arrows indicating the boundary conditions applied to it.


Fixed voltage applied on the upper finger

Figure 2 - Fixed voltage applied on the upper finger 
 

Fixed voltage 2 (30V)

The movable part of the actuator is assigned a positive voltage, as illustrated in Figure 3, indicating the application points for the voltage.

Fixed voltage applied on the lower finger

Figure 3 - Fixed voltage applied on the lower finger 

 

Structural boundary condition

Fixed boundary condition 


Fixed constraint applied on the fingers
 
                                  Figure 4 - Fixed constraint applied on the fingers
 

Meshing

The model geometry is relatively simple, and applying mesh control to refine the lower finger is adequate for precise electrical and structural outcomes. As shown in Figure 4, the mesh on the movable part is finer than on other parts, while the beam connecting the lower finger to its anchor doesn't require such fine meshing.

The upper finger, depicted in blue in Figure 5, has a coarser mesh since it won't undergo any deflection.


The meshed model


Figure 5 - The meshed model


Simulation Results

After completing the simulation, EMS generates a table detailing the resultant electric rigid body force on the model's components. Specifically, the focus is on identifying the electric force acting on the lower finger—the movable part of the actuator. Figure 6 displays the components of the electric force vector acting on the plate, with the force values provided in Newtons.
 

Electric force (Results table)


table

 

The Analytical formula

F e l equals 1 half fraction numerator partial differential c over denominator partial differential y end fraction space V squared space equals fraction numerator n epsilon subscript 0 space t over denominator g end fraction V squared

 

C: the capacitance of the actuator
V: the voltage applied to the moving finger
n: the number of moving fingers
t: The thickness of the actuator
g: the gap between the upper and lower fingers
epsilon subscript 0: absolute electrical permittivity

Correlation between EMS and the reference resultlarge blank subscript blank

 
  EMS Result Simulation Result
Resultant Displacement under 30V (in meters)    4.16e-08        5e-08
 
Table 2. Comparison between EMS and the reference results
 

Reaction force (Spring restoring force) 
 

table2


Resultant Displacement plot


 The deformed geometry of the actuator

Figure 6 - The deformed geometry of the actuator

Conclusion

The application note delves into the optimization of electrostatic comb-drive actuators, focusing on enhancing travel distance and force output. Utilizing the EMS electro-structural module, the study calculates the movement generated by electrostatic forces, omitting gravity's influence for simplicity. The analyzed model, with a focus on the geometry and material properties essential for the simulation, provides a detailed insight into the design and operational mechanics of these actuators.

Key to this investigation is the application of specific electrical boundary conditions to simulate the electrostatic forces acting between the interdigitated fingers of the actuator. By assigning different voltages to the movable and fixed parts, the study meticulously examines the resultant electric force and its impact on the actuator's displacement. The simulation's precision is further enhanced by tailored mesh control, ensuring accurate electrical and structural outcomes.

The findings underscore the actuator's capability to produce significant displacement under a 30V applied voltage, demonstrating the potential of comb-drive actuators in various fields, including optical and wireless communications, biomedical engineering, and nanotechnology. The correlation between EMS results and reference data validates the simulation's accuracy, offering valuable insights for optimizing the performance of MEMS electrostatic comb-drive actuators. 

References

[1]: S. Gupta, T Pahwa, R Narwal, B.Prasad and D. Kumar.  Optimizing the Performance of MEMS Electrostatic Comb Drive actuator with different Flexure Springs. 

 



Share on