In injection molding tools, the common employment of Electromagnetic surface induction heating instead of conventional volume heating, is due to many advantages: it provides a rapid selective heating time and a reduced cooling time.
Although many studies have discussed the influence of induction heating rate by major factors, such as coil design, number of coil-turns, working frequency, and heating distance, few studies have investigated other crucial factors, such as the thickness of the heated target and the position of the induction coil. In this study, the effects of the design and the position of the used inductors were investigated to control the surface mold temperature. To achieve such investigation, an electro-thermal simulation using EMS software is conducted to study the High-Frequency Proximity Heating.
High-frequency proximity heating is frequently used to rapidly heat injection molds. Its principle is founded on the proximity effect between a pair of parallel mold plates (Cavity and core) facing each other with a small gap and forming a high-frequency electric close circuit. High frequency current will then flow at the inner surfaces of each mold insert, thus rapidly heating the mold surfaces by skin effect. The figure below shows a schematic demonstration of the studied phenomenon.
Figure 1 - Schematic illustration of the High-frequency proximity heating principle [1].
The studied model consists of two parallel square mold inserts with three circular cross-section channels supporting the current conductors. The inductor design selected in the simulation, shown in figure2, is made of 6 copper tubes hollowed from inside for the cooling need.
Table 1 contains the detailed dimensions of each component.
Figure 2 - 3D CAD design of the studied model.
Table 1 - Components` dimensions
Component | Part | Dimensions (mm) |
Mold plates | Length | 100 |
width | 100 | |
thickness | 32 | |
Mold gap | 1 | |
Channel | Diameter | 16 |
Channel depth | 4 | |
Distance between channels | 25 | |
Coil | Outer diameter | 16 |
Inner diameter | 8 |
The main goal of this analysis is to compute the temperature distribution across each mold plate surface to achieve a better temperature control during the heating mold process. Thus, AC magnetic module of EMS is used coupled to the transient thermal study to model the induced heating treatment.
The following 4 steps are needed for the simulation setup.
The mold plates are made of Stainless steel N700. The corresponding thermal and magnetic properties are detailed in table 2.
Part | Material | Density ( |
Magnetic permeability | Electrical resistivity ( |
Thermal conductivity (W/m. K) |
Specific heat capacity (J/Kg. K) |
Coil | Copper (Cu) | 8940 | 0.99 | 1.71 E-07 | 400 | 392 |
Mold plates | Stainless steelN700 (ASTM-A564) |
7900 | 200 | 7.1 E-07 | 16 | 470 |
The inductor coils are defined as solid coils supporting a maximum current of 600 A rms and a frequency of 70 kHz.
The mold plates are pre-heated with an initial temperature of 40°C. A thermal convection is applied on the air body at ambient temperature of 25°C with a coefficient set to 10 W/m²C.
A mesh control was applied to both mold surfaces that are exposed to the proximity heating effect. A fine mesh is needed in these surfaces since eddy currents are mostly located in them.
After 15 s of induction heating, the simulation revealed the results shown in the figures below.
The induced current density is visualized in Figure 5. It achieved its maximum across the heated surfaces (figure 5b) between the core and cavity mold plate, which is in a good agreement with the Reference [1] results.
EMS allows to compute and visualize the temperature distribution on the induced surfaces, which is showing a good balanced distribution having an average value varying between 80°C and 90°C.
A comparison between the obtained and the reference [1] (Experimental and simulation) temperature results at the mold surface center, shows a good coincidence between them. Which confirms the experimental results.
Results | Experiment-Ref [1] | Simulation-Ref [1] | EMS |
Temperature at cavity plate center (°C) | 83 | 83.4 | 83 |
The figure 7 shows a second comparison between the experimental [1] and EMS simulation results taking into account the temperature variation at the center of the cavity surface plate versus time.
The obtained results show that temperature distribution and its uniformity on the mold plate surfaces were improved by the High-Frequency Proximity Heating (HFPH). They are in a good agreement with experimental measurements. Therefore, application of HFPH can rely on the estimated EMS simulation tool.